I still don't see why that mandates doing one contract at a time as
opposed to a set-based operation.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Singh Kanwar
> [mailto:mssqldba-ezmlmshield-x33555071.[Email address protected]
> Sent: 29 October 2004 14:27
> To: LazyDBA Discussion
> Subject: RE: parallel execution of query
>
> i do not know all the contractIDs in the advance, it has to
> be picked up from other table at the time of execution,
> because the contractids keep changing. because of nature of
> work, DTS is not feasable.
>
> Thanks
>
> KP


MS Sql Server LazyDBA home page