I do a similar setup, but you only get good performance if the
partitions are physically separated onto different drives, otherwise,
you are going to lower your Disk IO

Thanks,
Neal

-----Original Message-----
From: Gord Debiasi
[mailto:mssqldba-ezmlmshield-x94068624.[Email address protected]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:28 PM
To: LazyDBA Discussion
Subject: Friday Question

Hello All,

Easy question....

I have just built a SQL 2005 cluster. I have created 6 partitions as
follows:

A: Data (primary)
B: Secondary
C: Logs
D: System Tables
E: Backups


Is this a good structure considering performance/best practice?

Thanks




---------------------------------------------------------------------
TO REPLY TO EVERYBODY , PLEASE CLICK REPLY-ALL, NOT JUST REPLY
To post a dba job: http://jobs.lazydba.com
To subscribe : http://www.LazyDBA.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.lazydba.com/unsubscribe.html


________________________________________________________________________
_____
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by
MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
________________________________________________________________________
_____

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________

MS Sql Server LazyDBA home page